Document Type
Conference Note
Publication Date
3-21-1988
Abstract
Dear Chief,
As you may recall, petitioner's counsel informed us at oral argument that because Shelton did not complete a necessary IFP affidavit, his petition for certiorari was not filed by the clerk. Johnson was a party in the proceedings but did not seek certiorari. In view of the jurisdictional deficiencies, do you still wish the per curiam to cover Shelton and Johnson?
Recommended Citation
Kennedy, A.M. Correspondence from Kennedy to Rehnquist, Bennett v. Arkansas, 485 U.S. 395 (1988). Box 367, Harry A. Blackmun Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.