Date of Award

10-30-2023

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

School of Kinesiology and Recreation

First Advisor

Michael Torry

Abstract

This study compared Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems in measuring peak ankle angles and Range of Motion (ROM) during Countermovement Jumps (CMJ) and Lateral Skater Jumps (LSJ). Ankle angles in pitch, roll, and yaw were determined by integrating gyroscope data, aligning with foot flat reference, and fusing with accelerometer-derived inclination angles using a complementary filter. We hypothesized that IMU-based methods would parallel OMC in capturing peak angles and ROM during CMJ and LSJ landings, with accuracy and reliability assessed via Root Mean Square (RMSE) and Intraclass Correlation (ICC) statistics. For CMJ, high accuracy and reliability were observed in the Peak Positive Frontal angle with RMSE of 6.72° and ICC of 0.517. However, LSJ displayed lower performance, with no metric reaching an ICC > 0.5 or an RMSE < 10°. The study suggests limitations of IMU in accurately capturing ankle joint kinematics in dynamic jumps using these methods.

Comments

Imported from Olawore_ilstu_0092N_12511.pdf

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30707/ETD2023.20240124055107909572.999987

Page Count

29

Download

Share

COinS