Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
Publication Title
USApp–American Politics and Policy Blog
Abstract
The majority opinion is the main vehicle for policy-making for state and federal courts. Longer opinions usually indicate a more detailed explanation of the decision of the majority. But is the length of these opinions influenced by whether justices are appointed or elected? In new research Meghan E. Leonard and Joseph V. Ross find that while the length of these opinions is not directly affected by how judges are selected, appointed justices write longer opinions when a separate opinion is filed or when the majority opinion author is not randomly selected, as compared to states where justices are selected through contestable elections.
Recommended Citation
Leonard, Meghan E. and Ross, Joseph V., "Elected and Appointed Justices Face Different Constraints in Writing Opinions" (2015). Faculty Publications – Politics and Government. 9.
https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/fpapol/9
Comments
First published to USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science, 10 Jul 2015, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/62661.
This open access article is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives license.