Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of Education Policy
Publication Date
2024
Keywords
Neoliberalism, education reform, critical policy analysis, racial inequality, discourse coalitions
Abstract
This critical policy analysis examines how U.S. education reform in the post-Brown v.Board of Education era co-opted civil rights language to advance neoliberal and White supremacist agendas. By tracing the evolution of key terms like equality, freedom, and choice in influential policy texts from 1954 to 1965, the paper illuminates discursive strategies used to naturalize market-based reforms and deflect attention from structural racism. While focused on the U.S. context, the analysis has broad international relevance, as similar processes of rearticulating civil rights language to serve neoliberal ends can be observed in education reforms globally. The analytical framework developed here can be adapted to examine how concepts of equality, freedom, and choice operate in education policies across diverse national settings. This work advances understanding of how ostensibly progressive language can be used to deepen educational inequalities.
Funding Source
This article was published Open Access thanks to a transformative agreement between Milner Library and Taylor & Francis.
DOI
10.1080/02680939.2024.2420325
Recommended Citation
Kalmes, L. E. (2024). Loosely Defined: Neoliberalism, Democracy, and Discursive Contestation in Post-Brown Education Reform. Journal of Education Policy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2024.2420325
Comments
First published in Journal of Education Policy: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2024.2420325
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.