"“MY PAIN WAS NEVER MORE VALUABLE THAN HIS POTENTIAL”: A RHETORICAL THE" by Makayla Roller

Graduation Term

Spring 2025

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Department

School of Communication

Committee Chair

Jospeh P. Zompetti

Committee Member

Lauren Bratslavsky

Committee Member

Andrew Ventigmilia

Abstract

This thesis examines gaslighting within three prominent sexual abuse cases—Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer, and Larry Nassar—uncovered during the #MeToo movement, to better understand the rhetorical function of gaslighting. Using a combination of rhetorical thematic analysis, critical discourse analysis, a feminist lens, and a gaslighting schema, this study identifies the rhetorical tactics, gendered discourse, and power-laden discourse deployed to gaslight victims and the public. I argue that gaslighting must be examined through a rhetorical lens, as discourse is the mechanism through which gaslighting operates, shaping perceptions of truth, credibility, and power. By highlighting how language is weaponized to deny, distort, and shift blame, this study contributes to ongoing discussions about power, gender, and the role of rhetoric in shaping public understanding of sexual abuse allegations.

Access Type

Thesis-Open Access

Share

COinS