Graduation Term
Spring 2025
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
School of Communication
Committee Chair
Jospeh P. Zompetti
Committee Member
Lauren Bratslavsky
Committee Member
Andrew Ventigmilia
Abstract
This thesis examines gaslighting within three prominent sexual abuse cases—Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer, and Larry Nassar—uncovered during the #MeToo movement, to better understand the rhetorical function of gaslighting. Using a combination of rhetorical thematic analysis, critical discourse analysis, a feminist lens, and a gaslighting schema, this study identifies the rhetorical tactics, gendered discourse, and power-laden discourse deployed to gaslight victims and the public. I argue that gaslighting must be examined through a rhetorical lens, as discourse is the mechanism through which gaslighting operates, shaping perceptions of truth, credibility, and power. By highlighting how language is weaponized to deny, distort, and shift blame, this study contributes to ongoing discussions about power, gender, and the role of rhetoric in shaping public understanding of sexual abuse allegations.
Access Type
Thesis-Open Access
Recommended Citation
Roller, Makayla, "“MY PAIN WAS NEVER MORE VALUABLE THAN HIS POTENTIAL”: A RHETORICAL THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF GASLIGHTING WITHIN SEXUAL ABUSE CASES" (2025). Theses and Dissertations. 2124.
https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/2124