Tracking Privilege-Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes
Arts and Humanities
Classrooms are unlevel knowing fields, contested terrains where knowledge and ignorance are produced and circulate with equal vigor, and where members of dominant groups are accustomed to having an epistemic home‐terrain advantage. My project focuses on one form of resistance that regularly surfaces in discussions with social‐justice content. Privilege‐preserving epistemic pushback is a variety of willful ignorance that many members of dominant groups engage in when asked to consider both the lived and structural injustices that members of marginalized groups experience daily. I argue that this dominant form of resistance is neither an expression of skepticism nor a critical‐thinking practice. I suggest that standard philosophical engagements with these expressions of resistance are incapable of tracking the harms of privilege‐preserving epistemic pushback. I recommend treating this pushback as a “shadow text,” that is, as a text that runs alongside the readings in ways that offer no epistemic friction. I offer this as one critical philosophical practice for making students mindful of the ways they contribute to the circulation of ignorance and epistemic violence during the course of their discussions.
Bailey, Alison, "Tracking Privilege-Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes" (2017). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Publications. 108.
This article was published in Hypatia: Vol. 32, Issue 4. (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12354